New flash video by White Noise, â€œBe Careful What You Sayâ€ on the making of the US KGB, which is taken from ‘Who’s Afriad of Osama Wolf?’ — the first chapter in the new edition of Armed Madhouse by Greg Palast.
Middle East analyst Flynt Leverett, who served under President Bush on the National Security Council and is now a fellow at the New America Foundation, revealed today that the White House has been blocking the publication of an op-ed he wrote for the New York Times. The column is critical of the administrationâ€™s refusal to engage Iran.
In Think Progress
Thanks. I think I was able to put out some of my basic ideas on how we need to be engaging Iran diplomatically. Theyâ€™re, you know, expounded on in greater length on paper. I wanted to say something briefly about the administration, and where it is.
I have been extremely pessimistic that this administration is inclined or capable of genuinely rethinking its approach to Iran in the way that we need it to at this point, and Iâ€™ve had an unfortunate experience this week that has only confirmed that for me. As I do with all of my publications, the Century Foundation paper, I showed to the CIA, for whom I used to work, to verify that I was not revealing classified information. They did so, as they have with 30 other things that Iâ€™ve published since leaving government. Didnâ€™t ask to change a word.
I prepared an op-ed for the New York Times off of this paper, which is ready to go, ready for publication. The CIA says that as far as theyâ€™re concerned, thereâ€™s not any classified information in it. But the White House has intervened, claiming that there is classified information in the op-ed, even though itâ€™s already been cleared. Itâ€™s all published. Itâ€™s all based on stuff that Secretary Powell, Secretary Rice, Deputy Secretary Armitage have talked about publicly. Itâ€™s been extensively reported in the media. But the White House is saying I canâ€™t publish an op-ed in the New York Times that lays out the argument. Iâ€™ve been doing this for three and a half years since leaving government, and Iâ€™ve never had to go to the White House to get clearance for something that I was publishing as long as the CIA said, â€˜Yeah, youâ€™re not putting classified information.â€™
Why this week â€” after the Baker study group, when pressure is on them to rethink their position on Iran â€” why do they not want this op-ed, based on my experiences in government, my experience dealing with Iran, with Iranian officials, after I left government? Why do they not want this op-ed going in the New York Times this week? I think it says something, and I think it says something about just how low people like Elliot Abrams at the NSC [National Security Council] will stoop to try and limit the dissemination of arguments critical of the administrationâ€™s policy.
According to the Manchester Union-Leader: “Gingrich, speaking at a Manchester awards banquet, said a ‘different set of rules’ may be needed to reduce terrorists’ ability to use the Internet and free speech to recruit and get out their message.
â€œI am seeking to create a movement to win the future by offering a series of solutions so compelling that if the American people say I have to be president, it will happen.â€ – Newt Gingrich
George Washington University Constitutional Law professor, Jonathan Turley, joins Keith to talk about the law that Senator Feingold said would be seen as “a stain on our nations history.”